About Us

  • Eyes on Trade is a blog by the staff of Public Citizen's Global Trade Watch (GTW) division. GTW aims to promote democracy by challenging corporate globalization, arguing that the current globalization model is neither a random inevitability nor "free trade." Eyes on Trade is a space for interested parties to share information about globalization and trade issues, and in particular for us to share our watchdogging insights with you! GTW director Lori Wallach's initial post explains it all.

Contact

« Senators Defend Dolphin Protections Threatened by WTO Ruling | Main | Al Jazeera Asks: Will Colombia's Protesting Workers Be Heard? »

August 21, 2012

Victory for Public Health in Australia, But Big Tobacco Threatens Counterattack through Trade Pacts

Last week, public health advocates rejoiced when Australia’s High Court (its Supreme Court equivalent) upheld the country’s landmark tobacco control “plain packaging” laws against a legal attack from Big Tobacco.  Phillip Morris, British American Tobacco, Imperial Tobacco, and Japan Tobacco had sued the government, arguing that the new requirement to sell cigarettes packages with large health warnings rather than brand trademarks would constitute an uncompensated taking of their intellectual property rights. Ultimately, the court ruled that the public health law did not violate the constitution of Australia, where smoking kills 15,000 people each year. Starting on December 1st, all cigarettes and tobacco products will be sold in plain, brand-free packages with graphic health warnings. 

Australian Attorney-General Nicolos Roxon welcomed the ruling as “a watershed moment for tobacco control around the world.”

Despite this legal victory for public health at Australia’s highest court, unfortunate provisions in trade and investment pacts provide Big Tobacco with additional avenues to attack Australia’s plain packaging policies in foreign tribunals. Internationally, the law already faces attack at both the World Trade Organization (WTO) and through an obscure investment treaty.

Only hours after the ruling, Ukraine filed a formal complaint against the law at the WTO, arguing that the plain packaging law violates Australia’s commitment under the WTO and requesting the establishment of a formal disputes panel. Honduras and the Dominican Republic have also filed complaints. When asked if he thought the big tobacco companies were behind Ukraine's decision to launch its WTO case, Australia’s Trade Minister Craig Emerson said that he was "not aware of tobacco being a big industry in Ukraine, so one would wonder why it would have a big interest in this".

Australia’s plain packaging is also being challenged by tobacco company Philip Morris under the Hong-Kong-Australia bilateral investment treaty (BIT). The U.S. company incorporated a subsidiary in Hong Kong in order to launch the attack through this obscure treaty. A tribunal of three private sector lawyers constituted under the United Nations Commission on International Trade Law (UNCITRAL) will conduct the arbitration to decide whether the laws have had a significant negative impact on Philip Morris’ investment in Australia.

The extreme investor rights contained in the BIT pose particular threats to the case for plain packaging policies. According to Dr. Kyla Tienhaara, a trade law expert at Australian National University (ANU), “The investor-state dispute under the Hong Kong treaty is particularly concerning for supporters of the legislation. Unlike the WTO, there’s no exception under the treaty for public health measures. And unlike in the Australian Constitution, 'expropriation' (the act of a government taking private property) is defined very broadly.”

These cases, which demonstrate the danger of allowing investors a supranational avenue to attack public interest laws, have strengthened Australia’s commitment to not allow foreign investors to sue its government before panels of international trade arbitrators. Australia has refused to be subjected to investor-state dispute settlement in the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP), which is being pushed by multinational companies including Philip Morris.  (The TPP's leaked investment chapter, meanwhile, reveals that the pact would require all other countries, including the US, to allow foreign investors to sue their national governments).  

Australia is facing pressure domestically in response to this rejection of investor-state suits in TPP. The Australian Chamber of Commerce and Industry (ACCI) has launched a “Right to Sue” campaign, and has sent a letter to the Prime Minister urging the government to consider including ISDS (Investor-State Dispute Settlement) in future FTAs. (You can find a good analysis of the misleading claims of the campaign and letter here.)

Through progressive tobacco regulation policies, Australia has set an important precedent in placing a higher value on domestic public health policies over foreign investor rights. Unfortunately, trade and investment pacts provide Big Tobacco with second and third avenues to subvert the will of the Australian people and its highest court. The good news is that other countries will inevitably follow Australia’s lead on tobacco control policies.  Hopefully they will also follow Australia's prudent decision to reject extreme foreign investor rights in trade pacts like the TPP.  

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d83452507269e2017c316572c1970b

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Victory for Public Health in Australia, But Big Tobacco Threatens Counterattack through Trade Pacts:

Comments

sklep wędkarski

It is very informative post! thanks for sharing the blog and keep on updating the blog.

jobs in australia

Australia should implement stricter policies on tobaccos like higher taxes.

Chi machine weight loss

This item was an thoughts for me to discuss with everyone I know. I must compliment the writer and the place and arriving up with a amazing being like this.

Mcx Tips Free Trial

The post is written in a very good manner and it entails much useful information for me

Texans Arian Foster Jersey

like ur article,thanks for ur sharing with us .

49ers Alex Smith Jersey

The first of all time I discovered your ebooks follows drew in, discover your literate locution makes up truly fascinating personifies existent beneficial!

sipunkumar581@yahoo.com

we see companies forget to take care of the workers whose efforts and hard work keep things running.

Raija Sutinen

Tobacco is really something that we can't banned and many people are really addicted in it.In Sweden many people are very addicted in cigarette that's why many of them are really reducing it because they know that health risk on to much tobacco.Now a days they are using electronic cigarette which lead them to reduce the smoking and amount of health risk their taking in a day.Well thanks for this article i hope that many people realize that using tobacco is really harmful.

Ric McCoy

The big tobacco companies will win out in the end for they have too much money to spend on defending their rights.

ABSolute Vapors

Great site and your comments are dead on and we can not be silent any more, but must start voicing our opinions.

Australia news

Hi, tobacco threatens are really a great crisis for all countries and Its been hard to know that its now has a counterattack in Australia.

dodge seat covers

I made for my last car, but this time I'm adjusting the pattern to include the special seams where the car seat has them.

Mark Sjoblom

So true. Lucky for all of us, the EU just allowed E-cigarettes, effectively making them tobacco products instead of medicinal products. This bodes well for the industry, insofar as such a thing exists...

Post a comment

If you have a TypeKey or TypePad account, please Sign In.

Recent Posts

Subscribe