Morales rising: Evo win margin jumps 15% on record of stopping NAFTA-WTO expansion; reasserting control over natural resources
President Evo Morales was
returned to office last week following a controversial ‘recall referendum’ pushed by
rightwing political opponents with a landslide victory of 68%. Morales, the first indigenous president
Morales’ landslide victory exposed the marginality of a vocal bloc of right-wing separatists in the country’s gas and oil-rich regions. Their goal – to get things back to pre-Morales days when a small elite controlled the revenues from the country’s massive energy resources and farm land. And they are desperate to derail Morales' planned constitutional and social reforms, including regaining control of the country’s oil and gas resources and land redistribution for one of the world’s erstwhile poorest nations.
The right wing had two related strategies: breaking the oil-producing lowland regions away from the rest of the country and taking the national oil revenues with and um...throwing Morales out of office. The first avenue is unconstitutional (although that has not stopped them from repeatedly trying) but now they’ve just gotten whomped on Plan B to un-elect Morales.
Media reports of the past week have largely focused on predictions that the defeated right wing would continue to attack Morales despite the massive vote of public confidence, since four key separatist opponents of Morales were also, as expected (and detailed in a report by WOLA here), returned to their regional posts. The significance of Morales’ rising support levels have largely been swept under the carpet: When Morales was elected in late 2005, his 53 victory was by far the largest in the country’s history, making him the first Bolivian leader able to claim an absolute majority. Two years later, his support has grown by a further 15%.
Such numbers suggest widespread support among
Morales’ campaign for social and economic justice extends beyond
“The WTO negotiations have turned into a fight by developed countries to
open markets in developing countries to favor their big companies…The poorest
countries will be the main losers. The economic projections of a potential WTO
agreement, carried out even by the World Bank, indicate that the cumulative
costs of the loss in employment, the restrictions to national policymaking and
the loss in tariff revenues will be greater than the “gains” from the
After seven years, the WTO round is anchored in the past and out of date with the most important phenomena we are currently living: the food crisis, the energy crisis, climate change and the elimination of cultural diversity. The world is being led to believe that an agreement is needed to resolve the global agenda and this agreement does not correspond to that reality. Its bases are not appropriate to resist this new global agenda,” Morales said in a statement
ahead of the talks.
It is just this sort of clarity and principled defense of the interests of his country’s
majority poor population that makes the right wing in