• TheWatchdogBlog.org is published by Public Citizen's Congress Watch. We work to ensure that Congress represents citizens by exposing the harmful impact of money in politics and fighting for an improved democracy. We also champion consumer interests before the U.S. Congress and seek to preserve citizen access to the courts to redress corporate harm and negligence.

Our Mascot

  • Our mascot, Brandice
Statement of Policies

« Protect the Elderly from Forced Arbitration | Main | Protecting the rights of government whistleblowers »

Forced Arbitration Impedes Credit Card Reform Effort

If you read the paper or the US PIRG blog this weekend, then you know about an editorial in Sunday's edition of the NY Times that appealed to Senators Obama, McCain and Biden to urge Senate and House leadership to support the  Credit Cardholders’ Bill of Rights.  We agree with the Times' assessment of the bill's importance:

Too many people are finding that even if they pay their bills regularly, their interest rates can still be jacked through the roof. The Credit Cardholders’ Bill of Rights would help rein in some of the worst abuses. It would stop creditors from applying interest rates retroactively to balances incurred under an old rate, or charging late fees for checks mailed days before the due date.

Doing away with the punitive practices that credit card and other consumer service industries use to penalize consumers and line their own pockets is a worthy goal, but enacting this legislation is not enough.  Credit card reform will not be comprehensive until Congress has made sure that consumers are able to fight for their rights, and that the fight is a fair one.

Just as the Bill of Rights would not be complete without the Seventh Amendment right to a jury trial in civil cases, the Credit Cardholders' Bill of Rights will not be complete until consumers who have been wronged are able to bring their claims in an unbiased court of law.  Congress can restore this right to consumers by banning the practice of pre-dispute binding mandatory arbitration (BMA), whereby a wide range of consumer service companies, including credit cards, impose a private, for-profit dispute resolution forum on their customers as a condition of service.

BMA helps corporations evade liability under consumer credit protection laws in two ways.  First, many arbitration clauses contain class action bans, even though several states prohibit them.  Since many credit card fees are small but widely imposed, companies have immunity for their unfair practices.  Arbitrators are also free to ignore federal law because courts cannot overturn arbitrators' decisions, even when an arbitrator has misapplied the law or failed to apply the law altogether. Their decisions are virtually beyond review, allowing companies to stay above the law.

In another Times article on credit card regulation, our friend Ed Mierzwinski at PIRG emphasized that the credit card reform effort has, to this point, failed to address BMA:

None of the bills or proposals deals with the lenders’ mandatory binding arbitration clauses that became standard in the late 1990s. Those clauses made class-action lawsuits charging lender wrongdoing almost impossible to bring, said Mr. Mierzwinski.

Private enforcement is important because, as we have seen recently, the federal government cannot be everywhere at once.   BMA has rendered the part of the Consumer Credit Protection Act providing for private cardholder enforcement of some of its provisions through civil law suits, including class actions, virtually useless.

How do we rectify this problem?  The answer is simple:

Legislation called the Arbitration Fairness Act of 2007, written by Senator Russell D. Feingold, Democrat of Wisconsin, and Representative Hank Johnson Jr., Democrat of Georgia, ensures consumers the choice of jury trials.

Congress must fully address the problems facing average Americans by passing the Arbitration Fairness Act.  Without it, credit card companies will be able to continue some of their most predatory practices without any fear of having to answer to their customers.

The new proposed credit card reforms are positive, and we support them.  But consumers will not have complete protection from abusive business practices until Congress has prohibited BMA.

Consumers deserve the right to hold the companies that have injured them accountable.


TrackBack URL for this entry:

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Forced Arbitration Impedes Credit Card Reform Effort:

» mobilephone free gift deal from mobilephone free gift deal
Did you know you can get a valuable free gift with your next contract moble phone... such as Wii, HDTV,top spec Laptops, Playstation, Tom Tom and much more? And its all from a name you can trust... Tesco! YOu'd be nuts to go direct to network with this... [Read More]


Average Joe

The only bill of rights Biden would support regardiung this would be one for the banks.

Post a comment

Comments are moderated, and will not appear on this weblog until the author has approved them.

If you have a TypeKey or TypePad account, please Sign In.